academykerop.blogg.se - Silverlight for mac os 10.4

#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 FOR MAC OS X#
#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 INSTALL#
#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 CODE#
#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 WINDOWS#

Silverlight: Differences between the 1.0 Beta and.

NET CLR subset in Silverlight 1.1 Alpha is a stepping stone to MS having the complete. I also can't believe that McLaws is correct and that the. I am not ready to proclaim that Microsoft has changed the game as Robert McLaws has, but they certainly look like stronger competition to Flash/FLEX/Apollo than before today. One more thing of interest, inside the plug-in is another bundle, CoreCLR.bundle, which has the following contents:Īll and all, I am very excited about the possibilities. plugin bundle on OS X, you can put just about anything you want in there, but my understanding of how files are loaded and referenced inside a bundle is pretty limited, so I could easily be glossing over a much more complicated problem. It seems that's partially the beauty of the. The packaged format of the plugin on OS X doesn't really support that right now, but no reason that I know of that couldn't be the case. NET runtime does with major version releases.

#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 CODE#

I kind of hope that MS preserves multiple version of ugin to avoid code conflicts, like the full. Notice the version is the same, 0.8.5 (side rant: why isn't this at least 1.0.0? Oversight or more weird Microsoft versioning?).

#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 WINDOWS#

The other clue to this is the info windows if you extract the plug-ins from the installer packages and Get Info on both:

#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 INSTALL#

In fact, I think you can install 1.1 Alpha and just skip 1.0. Ah hah, agcore is the same in both 1.0 Beta and 1.1 Alpha, thus 1.1 Alpha appears to be a superset and you can install it without fear of breaking code that uses 1.0 after you install 1.1. The immediate most interesting thing is that agcore is the same size and has the same Date Modified with 1.1 Alpha installed as with 1.0 Beta (to bad there is no version info on these files). What a minute? This actually had me nervous at first, I didn't want to mess up 1.0 Beta by installing the 1.1 Alpha, how come the Silverlight plug-in can't have both versions side-by-side? Take a look at the contents of ugin after 1.1 Alpha is installed: The first thing that set off my spidey sense was that the Install button had changed to Upgrade: Look at the size of agcore and the Date Modified. Then go to Contents/MacOS and this is what you see: When the installer is done, this is what /Library/Internet Plug-Ins looks like: When you install Silverlight 1.0 Beta, this is what the installer package looks like immediately before letting it rip: How do I know? By inspecting the files, installers and the plug-in. This isn't immediately obvious, but the Silverlight 1.1 Alpha is a superset of Silverlight 1.0 Beta.

I actually didn't realize this existed, which is really cool. I haven't fully dove in, and you will need to install Chmox to read the documentation since it's in Compressed HTML (CHM, pronounced chum) files.

#SILVERLIGHT FOR MAC OS 10.4 FOR MAC OS X#

This isn't just for Windows, its for Mac OS X too!! This is not Visual Studio for Mac OS X, but it does start to answer the questions and criticism I and others leveled against MS for not inviting OS X developers to the party. Works on Vista and XP SP2 in IE 6, IE 7, Firefox 1.5.0.8, and Firefox 2.0.x Works on OS X 10.4 (though MS reqs don't say so, but Safari version is a giveaway) in Safari 2.0.4 and Firefox 1.5.0.8 + 2.0.x.

How much? I haven't found anything that says truly yet. Big deal here is that this release includes a subset of the. I watched the keynote, and I was a little confused at first, but here are the important bits from my perspective: At Mix 07 Microsoft significantly augmented Silverlight.